<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ham Radio . me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hamradio.me/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hamradio.me</link>
	<description>Ham Radio . Magnum Experimentum - Experiments, engineering and other articles of interest to radio folks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 03:02:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Modes Need Calibrated Soundcards by Navigator Interface works well, but has some issues</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/digital/digital-modes-need-calibrated-soundcards.html#comment-5349</link>
		<dc:creator>Navigator Interface works well, but has some issues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 03:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=797#comment-5349</guid>
		<description>[...] to the sound card interface of the Navigator with ease and works great so long as you remember to Calibrate your sound card settings with your software (like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the sound card interface of the Navigator with ease and works great so long as you remember to Calibrate your sound card settings with your software (like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Navigator from US Interface &#8211; a First Look by Navigator Interface works well, but has some issues</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/digital/the-navigator-from-us-interface-a-first-look.html#comment-5348</link>
		<dc:creator>Navigator Interface works well, but has some issues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 02:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=715#comment-5348</guid>
		<description>[...] this year I purchased the Navigator from US Interface. It has done a very nice job mopping up various connections between my computer and the Icom IC-746 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this year I purchased the Navigator from US Interface. It has done a very nice job mopping up various connections between my computer and the Icom IC-746 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Magnetic Mount Antennas Don&#8217;t Suck by NMO Through-Hole Mobile Antenna Installation &#124; Ham Radio</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/magnetic-mount-antennas-dont-suck.html#comment-5297</link>
		<dc:creator>NMO Through-Hole Mobile Antenna Installation &#124; Ham Radio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=1626#comment-5297</guid>
		<description>[...] antennas have much to offer the VHF and above mobile [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] antennas have much to offer the VHF and above mobile [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Help: How can I Migrate Microsoft Works 2004 Logs to New Program by John Huggins</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/uncategorized/help-how-can-i-migrate-microsoft-works-2004-logs-to-new-program.html#comment-2168</link>
		<dc:creator>John Huggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=1812#comment-2168</guid>
		<description>Richard,

The first step I would take is to export your database to a text file with either commas or tabs between the fields and one line per record.  I don&#039;t know how Microsoft Works 2004 behaves, but text exporting is a pretty common capability of most any database program.

Once you have exported it, I would zip it up and email it to yourself so you have it archived somewhere else.

Now with a text export of your QSO records in hand the next step depends greatly on your current logging program.  The information you have captured in your current database is exactly the information needed, but the format is likely unique.

If it is any of the mainline programs including, but not limited to, ACLog, Ham Radio Deluxe, etc. they all support ADIF import.  Your text file is certainly not ADIF format so an additional step is in order.

If you give me a copy of your text file export, I can very likely convert it to an ADIF file with an afternoon of scripting at an OSX/Linux prompt.

Much depends on your target logging program, but having an ADIF file of your past logs is never a bad idea even if you don&#039;t currently need it.

I might be able to work with your actual Microsoft Works file also and am willing to try.

Send the file to kx4o@hamradio.me if you would like me to help.

John, kx4o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>The first step I would take is to export your database to a text file with either commas or tabs between the fields and one line per record.  I don&#8217;t know how Microsoft Works 2004 behaves, but text exporting is a pretty common capability of most any database program.</p>
<p>Once you have exported it, I would zip it up and email it to yourself so you have it archived somewhere else.</p>
<p>Now with a text export of your QSO records in hand the next step depends greatly on your current logging program.  The information you have captured in your current database is exactly the information needed, but the format is likely unique.</p>
<p>If it is any of the mainline programs including, but not limited to, ACLog, Ham Radio Deluxe, etc. they all support ADIF import.  Your text file is certainly not ADIF format so an additional step is in order.</p>
<p>If you give me a copy of your text file export, I can very likely convert it to an ADIF file with an afternoon of scripting at an OSX/Linux prompt.</p>
<p>Much depends on your target logging program, but having an ADIF file of your past logs is never a bad idea even if you don&#8217;t currently need it.</p>
<p>I might be able to work with your actual Microsoft Works file also and am willing to try.</p>
<p>Send the file to <a href="mailto:kx4o@hamradio.me">kx4o@hamradio.me</a> if you would like me to help.</p>
<p>John, kx4o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Low Profile Vertical HF Antenna by Installing Ground Rods the Easy Way &#124; Ham Radio Help Desk</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/low-profile-vertical-hf-antenna.html#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator>Installing Ground Rods the Easy Way &#124; Ham Radio Help Desk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 04:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=241#comment-1463</guid>
		<description>[...] installing a Vertical Antenna system, I decided to use the water method again. This time, the installation was in a virgin farm field. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] installing a Vertical Antenna system, I decided to use the water method again. This time, the installation was in a virgin farm field. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Laird NMO Mobile Antenna Mounts by kx4o</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/laird-nmo-mobile-antenna-mounts.html#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>kx4o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=1721#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Hi there...

I soldered Times Microwave LMR-195 cable to my NMO mount and added a connector to the radio end.  The LMR-195 is a solid core so is less able to handle repeat bending, but my installation is pretty well fixed.  The jacket of the LMR cable is quite tough and that was a serious consideration for coax that must go over, under and past some abrasive points on its way to the radio.

I looked seriously at the NMO mounts with pre-made cables.  I only found RG58 options and I wanted something better.

LMR-240 should be great if not a little over kill, but for a fer-sure installation go for it.  I wouldn&#039;t bother with the stranded type unless you know for sure the cable will be moving around quite often.  One possible problem you might find is attaching the little black cover after your cable installation.  It relies on a plastic grip feature that is sized for a particular cable... most often RG58.  That was another reason I settled for LMR-195.

The plain mounts without cables cost under $10 each plus shipping.  As you know from my posts, I purchased several units to review.  One of them came from an Amazon listed vendor.  WPS Antennas was another vendor I think.  I also purchased a 19 inch NMO whip from WPS and everything tunes up quite well.  Do a search on NMO MABO or NMO MBO and you will find several sources ready to take your order.

Good luck and let us know how your install goes.  Even better, take some pics and let me format to a post for this web site.

73,
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there&#8230;</p>
<p>I soldered Times Microwave LMR-195 cable to my NMO mount and added a connector to the radio end.  The LMR-195 is a solid core so is less able to handle repeat bending, but my installation is pretty well fixed.  The jacket of the LMR cable is quite tough and that was a serious consideration for coax that must go over, under and past some abrasive points on its way to the radio.</p>
<p>I looked seriously at the NMO mounts with pre-made cables.  I only found RG58 options and I wanted something better.</p>
<p>LMR-240 should be great if not a little over kill, but for a fer-sure installation go for it.  I wouldn&#8217;t bother with the stranded type unless you know for sure the cable will be moving around quite often.  One possible problem you might find is attaching the little black cover after your cable installation.  It relies on a plastic grip feature that is sized for a particular cable&#8230; most often RG58.  That was another reason I settled for LMR-195.</p>
<p>The plain mounts without cables cost under $10 each plus shipping.  As you know from my posts, I purchased several units to review.  One of them came from an Amazon listed vendor.  WPS Antennas was another vendor I think.  I also purchased a 19 inch NMO whip from WPS and everything tunes up quite well.  Do a search on NMO MABO or NMO MBO and you will find several sources ready to take your order.</p>
<p>Good luck and let us know how your install goes.  Even better, take some pics and let me format to a post for this web site.</p>
<p>73,<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Copper J-Pole Antenna on Play Set by GMRS Two Way Radio - VHF J-pole Antenna Build Amateur/HAM Part-1</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/copper-j-pole-antenna-on-play-set.html#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>GMRS Two Way Radio - VHF J-pole Antenna Build Amateur/HAM Part-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=349#comment-328</guid>
		<description>[...] Copper J-Pole Antenna on Play Set &#124; Ham Radio Help Desk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Copper J-Pole Antenna on Play Set | Ham Radio Help Desk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Laird NMO Mobile Antenna Mounts by iz2gmv</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/laird-nmo-mobile-antenna-mounts.html#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>iz2gmv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=1721#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Hi! Thanks for this article, it&#039;s very interesting. Few questions:

Did you solder the cable yourself? Which cable did you use? Would you recommend this way or a model with a &quot;pre-made&quot; cable?

I was thinking to get some good-quality LMR-240 with stranded core (for added flexibility).

How much did you pay for the mounts? Is there a place you would recommend to buy them from?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! Thanks for this article, it&#8217;s very interesting. Few questions:</p>
<p>Did you solder the cable yourself? Which cable did you use? Would you recommend this way or a model with a &#8220;pre-made&#8221; cable?</p>
<p>I was thinking to get some good-quality LMR-240 with stranded core (for added flexibility).</p>
<p>How much did you pay for the mounts? Is there a place you would recommend to buy them from?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing a Vertical Antenna Base with no Concrete by WA8SIE</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/installations/installing-a-vertical-antenna-base-with-no-concrete.html#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>WA8SIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=587#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Thank you for taking the time to show this great display.  I used your guidelines to install my new W8AFX, Steve Sheers vertical antenna.  I use a heavy gauge gray PVC schedule 80 pipe instead of 
metal.  I used the same methods that you did and I used pea rock.  I must say it looks good.   I still have a to install the radials and coax.  I may purchase an auto tuner to mount at the base, which will make it very efficient system, if I can say that. HI.  //... Joe  WA8SIE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for taking the time to show this great display.  I used your guidelines to install my new W8AFX, Steve Sheers vertical antenna.  I use a heavy gauge gray PVC schedule 80 pipe instead of<br />
metal.  I used the same methods that you did and I used pea rock.  I must say it looks good.   I still have a to install the radials and coax.  I may purchase an auto tuner to mount at the base, which will make it very efficient system, if I can say that. HI.  //&#8230; Joe  WA8SIE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Use a loop if you can by N4RP</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/use-a-loop-if-you-can.html#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>N4RP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 00:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=1116#comment-294</guid>
		<description>My feed line consists of about 20&#039; RG-8X to get me up into the attic, into a 4:1 current balun, then about 75&#039; 450 window line to the loop.  It&#039;ll load up fine w/o a tuner on most of 160, about 200kHz of 80, all of 60, most of 40, 20 &amp; 15...  Autotuners in the shack have never had a problem tuning it up on any band.  I&#039;m going to put an autotuner in the attic this fall, right at the 4:1 balun, so there&#039;s never a high SWR on the 8X, we&#039;ll see how that works out.

73, N4RP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My feed line consists of about 20&#8242; RG-8X to get me up into the attic, into a 4:1 current balun, then about 75&#8242; 450 window line to the loop.  It&#8217;ll load up fine w/o a tuner on most of 160, about 200kHz of 80, all of 60, most of 40, 20 &amp; 15&#8230;  Autotuners in the shack have never had a problem tuning it up on any band.  I&#8217;m going to put an autotuner in the attic this fall, right at the 4:1 balun, so there&#8217;s never a high SWR on the 8X, we&#8217;ll see how that works out.</p>
<p>73, N4RP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Use a loop if you can by kx4o</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/use-a-loop-if-you-can.html#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>kx4o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 04:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=1116#comment-292</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If the feed line is actually Ã¢â‚¬Å“feed lineÃ¢â‚¬Â rather than two VERY widely spaced wires, you canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t really count it as part of the loop.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The parallel wires are not radiating parts of the loop to be sure, but are certainly part of the tuned feeder resonance length complete with standing waves.

&lt;blockquote&gt;To Elwood, my 543Ã¢â‚¬Â² loop is less than 5ohms DCR, wire loss is pretty much a non-issue&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Skin effect makes this more of an issue quick as frequency rises.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I operate my loop QRP 5W, phone and digital. My loop is only about 35Ã¢â‚¬Â² high, and IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve managed to exceed 1000mi/watt on 7 bands, during a solar minimum.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s awesome and speaks well of antennas with large effective apertures like this loop.  It speaks well of your operating skills too.

&lt;blockquote&gt;IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢d agree with go for the 525Ã¢â‚¬Â² one, but donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t count the feed line as part of the length...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The thing to avoid is the presentation of a high impedance to the tuner at the end of the parallel line... no matter how good it is.  We select a loop size plus feed-line length that presents the transmatch with something other than a spot on voltage maximum for each band we desire.  In the case above, the parallel feed-line length is pretty much set leaving only the loop length to adjust.

I agree the 525&#039; loop is the target circumference, but the feed-line presents this feed-point impedance to the shack at a different impedance.

Of course, if we place an automatic transmatch at the loop&#039;s feed-point our worries are less.

How long is your feed-line?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If the feed line is actually Ã¢â‚¬Å“feed lineÃ¢â‚¬Â rather than two VERY widely spaced wires, you canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t really count it as part of the loop.</p></blockquote>
<p>The parallel wires are not radiating parts of the loop to be sure, but are certainly part of the tuned feeder resonance length complete with standing waves.</p>
<blockquote><p>To Elwood, my 543Ã¢â‚¬Â² loop is less than 5ohms DCR, wire loss is pretty much a non-issue</p></blockquote>
<p>Skin effect makes this more of an issue quick as frequency rises.</p>
<blockquote><p>I operate my loop QRP 5W, phone and digital. My loop is only about 35Ã¢â‚¬Â² high, and IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve managed to exceed 1000mi/watt on 7 bands, during a solar minimum.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s awesome and speaks well of antennas with large effective apertures like this loop.  It speaks well of your operating skills too.</p>
<blockquote><p>IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢d agree with go for the 525Ã¢â‚¬Â² one, but donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t count the feed line as part of the length&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>The thing to avoid is the presentation of a high impedance to the tuner at the end of the parallel line&#8230; no matter how good it is.  We select a loop size plus feed-line length that presents the transmatch with something other than a spot on voltage maximum for each band we desire.  In the case above, the parallel feed-line length is pretty much set leaving only the loop length to adjust.</p>
<p>I agree the 525&#8242; loop is the target circumference, but the feed-line presents this feed-point impedance to the shack at a different impedance.</p>
<p>Of course, if we place an automatic transmatch at the loop&#8217;s feed-point our worries are less.</p>
<p>How long is your feed-line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Use a loop if you can by N4RP</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/use-a-loop-if-you-can.html#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>N4RP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=1116#comment-291</guid>
		<description>If the feed line is actually &quot;feed line&quot; rather than two VERY widely spaced wires, you can&#039;t really count it as part of the loop...

To Elwood, my 543&#039; loop is less than 5ohms DCR, wire loss is pretty much a non-issue....  

I operate my loop QRP 5W, phone and digital.  My loop is only about 35&#039; high, and I&#039;ve managed to exceed 1000mi/watt on 7 bands, during a solar minimum...

I&#039;d agree with go for the 525&#039; one, but don&#039;t count the feed line as part of the length.  Also, if you&#039;re planning to operate the loop on the harmonics, make it a little longer, remember 14.200/8 is only 1.775...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the feed line is actually &#8220;feed line&#8221; rather than two VERY widely spaced wires, you can&#8217;t really count it as part of the loop&#8230;</p>
<p>To Elwood, my 543&#8242; loop is less than 5ohms DCR, wire loss is pretty much a non-issue&#8230;.  </p>
<p>I operate my loop QRP 5W, phone and digital.  My loop is only about 35&#8242; high, and I&#8217;ve managed to exceed 1000mi/watt on 7 bands, during a solar minimum&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d agree with go for the 525&#8242; one, but don&#8217;t count the feed line as part of the length.  Also, if you&#8217;re planning to operate the loop on the harmonics, make it a little longer, remember 14.200/8 is only 1.775&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BigIR vs. 43 Foot Vertical Antenna @ 10 meters EZNEC Shootout by HAMRADIO_LY: is ilginimo nera naudos ? :-) ka manote ? &#187; LY Radio Lietuva</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/bigir-vs-43-foot-vertical-antenna-10-meters-eznec-shootout.html#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>HAMRADIO_LY: is ilginimo nera naudos ? :-) ka manote ? &#187; LY Radio Lietuva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=442#comment-223</guid>
		<description>[...] www.hamhelpdesk.com/antennas/bigir-vs-43-foot-vert&#8230;&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.hamhelpdesk.com/antennas/bigir-vs-43-foot-vert&#8230;&#8230" rel="nofollow">http://www.hamhelpdesk.com/antennas/bigir-vs-43-foot-vert&#8230;&#8230</a>; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 75 Meter Turnstile Antenna by kx4o</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/75-meter-turnstile-antenna.html#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>kx4o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=683#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Last year&#039;s results with this turnstile antenna on 75/80 meters were positive during the March Virginia QSO Party.  NVIS contacts were made with ease and the band was almost too loud.

This antenna will be going up again for this QSO Party again this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year&#8217;s results with this turnstile antenna on 75/80 meters were positive during the March Virginia QSO Party.  NVIS contacts were made with ease and the band was almost too loud.</p>
<p>This antenna will be going up again for this QSO Party again this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The 43 foot vertical &#8211; The answer to everything? by kx4o</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/answer-to-everything-43-feet-antenna.html#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>kx4o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=275#comment-206</guid>
		<description>One example of the 43 foot antenna rises in this post...

&lt;a href=&quot;/antennas/43-foot-antenna-installation-the-rising.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;43 Foot Antenna Installation Ã¢â‚¬â€œ The Rising&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One example of the 43 foot antenna rises in this post&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="/antennas/43-foot-antenna-installation-the-rising.html" rel="nofollow">43 Foot Antenna Installation Ã¢â‚¬â€œ The Rising</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Use a loop if you can by ecdowney</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/use-a-loop-if-you-can.html#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>ecdowney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=1116#comment-205</guid>
		<description>I would say just go with the 525 ft version. Longer will have more wire loss and the pattern will get even more complex as you go up in frequency.

If local noise is a problem you have the room to consider a Beverage antenna for receive. If you&#039;re not familiar with them start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverage_antenna .

Or, if you have access to QEX, there was a very interesting article about electronically steering an array of 160m verticals with a set of SDRs in the Nov/Dec 2009 issue.

73, Elwood, WB0OEW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say just go with the 525 ft version. Longer will have more wire loss and the pattern will get even more complex as you go up in frequency.</p>
<p>If local noise is a problem you have the room to consider a Beverage antenna for receive. If you&#8217;re not familiar with them start here: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverage_antenna" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverage_antenna</a> .</p>
<p>Or, if you have access to QEX, there was a very interesting article about electronically steering an array of 160m verticals with a set of SDRs in the Nov/Dec 2009 issue.</p>
<p>73, Elwood, WB0OEW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Haiti Amateur Radio Assistance by kx4o</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/emcomm/haiti-amateur-radio-assistance.html#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>kx4o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=1162#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Roger roger on the cash donations to Red Cross and the like; That&#039;s where most hams can help best despite SATERN, ARES, ALE, etc.

We should all watch very closely when and if these, arguably very well prepared, EmComm ham groups provide a tangible benefit.  I hope they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger roger on the cash donations to Red Cross and the like; That&#8217;s where most hams can help best despite SATERN, ARES, ALE, etc.</p>
<p>We should all watch very closely when and if these, arguably very well prepared, EmComm ham groups provide a tangible benefit.  I hope they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Priming Aluminum Antennas by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/priming-aluminum-antennas.html#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=663#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Melvin,

Thanks for posting your questions.

After carefully priming the antenna as described above, I applied two coats of generic flat black paint purchased from Home Depot.

Details of the antenna raising are available in this post...

&lt;a href=&quot;/antennas/43-foot-antenna-installation-the-rising.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;43 Foot Antenna - The Rising&lt;/a&gt;

So far the antenna is holding up very well against the weather here in Virginia.  There are no signs of paint flake, peel or other issues.

As far as I can tell the antenna performs fine with no perceptible issues caused by the paint.  Note my 43 foot antenna is just one big conductor with no traps or anything else.  I say this because some paints have conductivity and spraying this across some electrical boundary might cause problems.

My research into Zinc Chromate suggests it does not conduct.  However, I was never quite sure.  Also black paints typically have carbon in their makeup which might cause them to conduct at DC and/or RF frequencies.

The good news for me and you is our radiating element is just one big conductor mounted on a standoff at the base and should not be perturbed if the paint does conduct.  The aluminum will still be the dominant 43 foot conductor and should work just fine.  If anyone thinks otherwise I am eager to discuss.

I participate in QRP Fox Hunts on 80 and 40 plus various QSO Parties including the California Party on 80-15 meters with just this antenna.  I still wish I had a beam for 20-10, but cannot complain about how this antenna works; It just works.

My primed and painted 43 foot antenna is a keeper.

I wish you the best of luck with yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melvin,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting your questions.</p>
<p>After carefully priming the antenna as described above, I applied two coats of generic flat black paint purchased from Home Depot.</p>
<p>Details of the antenna raising are available in this post&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="/antennas/43-foot-antenna-installation-the-rising.html" rel="nofollow">43 Foot Antenna &#8211; The Rising</a></p>
<p>So far the antenna is holding up very well against the weather here in Virginia.  There are no signs of paint flake, peel or other issues.</p>
<p>As far as I can tell the antenna performs fine with no perceptible issues caused by the paint.  Note my 43 foot antenna is just one big conductor with no traps or anything else.  I say this because some paints have conductivity and spraying this across some electrical boundary might cause problems.</p>
<p>My research into Zinc Chromate suggests it does not conduct.  However, I was never quite sure.  Also black paints typically have carbon in their makeup which might cause them to conduct at DC and/or RF frequencies.</p>
<p>The good news for me and you is our radiating element is just one big conductor mounted on a standoff at the base and should not be perturbed if the paint does conduct.  The aluminum will still be the dominant 43 foot conductor and should work just fine.  If anyone thinks otherwise I am eager to discuss.</p>
<p>I participate in QRP Fox Hunts on 80 and 40 plus various QSO Parties including the California Party on 80-15 meters with just this antenna.  I still wish I had a beam for 20-10, but cannot complain about how this antenna works; It just works.</p>
<p>My primed and painted 43 foot antenna is a keeper.</p>
<p>I wish you the best of luck with yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Priming Aluminum Antennas by Melvin</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/priming-aluminum-antennas.html#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Melvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=663#comment-199</guid>
		<description>I have purchased a Zero Five antenna and I am wanting to paint it. I was just wondering how your project turned out, and does the paint job seem to have any affect on the performance of the antenna.

Thanks,

Melvin, AB5EQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have purchased a Zero Five antenna and I am wanting to paint it. I was just wondering how your project turned out, and does the paint job seem to have any affect on the performance of the antenna.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Melvin, AB5EQ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 43 Foot Antenna Installation &#8211; The Rising by kx4o</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/43-foot-antenna-installation-the-rising.html#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>kx4o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=1000#comment-194</guid>
		<description>UPDATE Oct 2009:
I participated in the California QSO Party this weekend and enjoyed many 40, 20 and 15 meter contacts using just the 43 foot vertical antenna.

I looked at 10 meters too, but there was nothing to be found there.

So it seems the 43 foot ground mounted antenna provides at least some functionality for 15 meters given my many contacts between Virginia and California.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE Oct 2009:<br />
I participated in the California QSO Party this weekend and enjoyed many 40, 20 and 15 meter contacts using just the 43 foot vertical antenna.</p>
<p>I looked at 10 meters too, but there was nothing to be found there.</p>
<p>So it seems the 43 foot ground mounted antenna provides at least some functionality for 15 meters given my many contacts between Virginia and California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Turning AGC Off Helps Kenwood TS-2000 CW by K2DSL</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/radios/turning-agc-off-help-kenwood-ts-2000-cw.html#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>K2DSL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=372#comment-191</guid>
		<description>Someone sent me a link to this page. When I put the rig in CW mode, the AGC indicator on the front panel goes off. Repeatedly pressing the AGC button [ button 8 ] on the front panel just results in AGC Off being displayed and the AGC indicator never shows as enabled.

Maybe I have something set in my radio that prevents AGC from being on in CW mode, the ham that mentioned this was in SSB mode where AGC is enabled, the ham meant something else, or there&#039;s some option I&#039;m not aware of to further turn off AGC beyond what my TS-2000 does just when I go into CW mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone sent me a link to this page. When I put the rig in CW mode, the AGC indicator on the front panel goes off. Repeatedly pressing the AGC button [ button 8 ] on the front panel just results in AGC Off being displayed and the AGC indicator never shows as enabled.</p>
<p>Maybe I have something set in my radio that prevents AGC from being on in CW mode, the ham that mentioned this was in SSB mode where AGC is enabled, the ham meant something else, or there&#8217;s some option I&#8217;m not aware of to further turn off AGC beyond what my TS-2000 does just when I go into CW mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

