<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ham Radio Help Desk &#187; dipole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hamradio.me/interests/dipole/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hamradio.me</link>
	<description>Hams helping hams make the most of the hobby of amateur radio.  (This site is moving from www.hamhelpdesk.com to www.hamradio.me)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dipole Generates Static in PL-259</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/dipole-generates-static-in-pl-259.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/dipole-generates-static-in-pl-259.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 13:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Huggins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[80m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dipole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pl259]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[static]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=1638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Static charge builds up on any conductor at almost all times including our antennas as the video shows.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/dipole-generates-static-in-pl-259.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JOTA Antenna Need Not Be Fancy</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/jota-antenna-need-not-be-fancy.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/jota-antenna-need-not-be-fancy.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Huggins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balanced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dipole]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/uncategorized/jota-antenna-need-not-be-fancy.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep it simple for the Jamboree on the Air - Use a ladder line fed dipole.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/jota-antenna-need-not-be-fancy.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why don&#8217;t hams like vertical dipole antennas?</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/why-dont-hams-like-vertical-dipole-antennas.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/why-dont-hams-like-vertical-dipole-antennas.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Huggins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dipole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vertical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom, ke6ynh, asks&#8230; &#8220;Why don&#8217;t hams like vertical dipole antennas. See: http://i31.tinypic.com/160udqb.gif Best regards. Tom KE6YNH, 73 San Diego, CA]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/why-dont-hams-like-vertical-dipole-antennas.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jpole vs. Coaxial Dipole EZNEC Shootout</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/jpole-vs-coaxial-dipole-eznec-shootout.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/jpole-vs-coaxial-dipole-eznec-shootout.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Huggins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEC Shootouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coaxial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dipole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j-pole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VHF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This J-Pole, Monopole, Coaxial Dipole VHF EZNEC shootout addresses a comment made that no models exist for j-pole and coaxial dipole antenna simulation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/jpole-vs-coaxial-dipole-eznec-shootout.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Low Profile Vertical HF Antenna</title>
		<link>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/low-profile-vertical-hf-antenna.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/low-profile-vertical-hf-antenna.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 00:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Huggins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[15m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dipole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vertical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verticals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamradio.me/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Described is a no nonsense 16 foot copper vertical antenna easy enough to build for a quick check to see if a vertical is for you.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hamradio.me/antennas/low-profile-vertical-hf-antenna.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

