First, I do not know who you are due to no name or call on this post, or why you have an issue with amateur radio operators volunteering to assist agencies in the time of public need. Can you explain to the other 700 + thousand amateur radio operators in the United States why this is bad, should not be part of amateur radio, and how it is giving the hobby a black eye. In addition, what is “too good to be true…”

As a member of ARES, there is no “If it sounds too good to be true…” part of the group. I and the other ARES members train to be useful during an emergency, but none of us wish that our training will be put to use.

Please tell us why, when working with emergency groups, disaster relief, and public safety agencies, that finds amateurs in the field that wearing identifying clothing, car signs, safety vests, and amber lights is in any way bad for the hobby. How can amateurs provide assistance to these agencies and not expect to be safe, while their serving agency counterpart have these things. I am not talking about red/blue lights, illegal in most states.

Last thing for the author, why not sign your name / call to your posts to let everyone know who we are talking to. I have found some good things on this site, but every post on emcomm, there is a very noticeable bad taste on amateurs volunteering.

Second, to new amateur radio operators. I agree, do not take this hobby too seriously. There are many aspects to this hobby and there are things for everyone. Joining ARES, Skywarn, or any other amateur radio emergency group to support a public or relief agency should be considered. I am not saying you should join, but at least know that “keeping your batteries charged” is not an option. These groups train constantly and much more is required then charged batteries. All I am asking is that you do your own research before making up your mind.

C. Phil Brunson, N7YBH