Does the KX3 really need a heatsink
It appears the answer is almost always no given the compromises and assumptions made by the engineers at Elecraft as Wayne Burdick (N6KR) reminds us…
“[. . .] supplemental heatsinking of the KX3 is *not* needed for typical digital-mode operation with the KX3. PSK31, RTTY, etc. will all function “out of the box” on the lower bands (20 meters is by far the most common band for digital communications).
If you want to use JT65 or other extremely narrowband modes, I do suggest doing extended VFO temperature compensation.”
Trading heft for convenience the KX3 provides ample heat dissipation for the “usual” SSB or CW operating environment and cleverly implements a software frequency stability mechanism should incidental oscillator warming occur. By usual of course I mean a transmission duty cycle or power low enough for modest heat generation by those two small final transistors.
Digital folks push the envelope
For any assumption anyone can make about how customers will use products, some make their gear Go to Eleven. So it goes with the 100% duty cycle digital crowd. I’ve not personally done digital with my KX3 yet, but am listening carefully to the threads on the KX3 forums about restricting power to accommodate digital modes.
Modularity breeds solutions
Thankfully the Elecraft customer base is a rather useful pool of talent resulting in the creation of various aftermarket mods for the KX3. Such is the case with the SideKX panels and cover which I immediately purchased the very instant they came out.
The discussion of heatsinks stimulates quite a number of various new modifications for the KX3. W7GJ is one prototype pioneer concerning the use of JT65 and the KX3…
There are two themes regarding the KX3 and heat: Handling heat flow form the final transistors and managing the heat around the oscillator to improve frequency stability. The narrowband digital folks are wary of any frequency stability issues, but the KX3’s built in compensation system is a good step forward. Regardless, W7GJ deals with both the finals’ heat and oscillator stability with two distinct solutions.
All that said, it appears the handling of the final transistor heat load is the more popular issue to address. This stimulates an ever growing Elecraft KX3 heatsink cottage industry with many heatsink approaches coming on the market. Here is a short list, heaviest first…
|Cooler KX Plus
|Cooler KX Lite
|Pro Audio Engineering
|Custom Heatsink for the Elecraft KX3
The one that caught my eye is the PAE-Kx31 from Pro Audio Engineering…
What appeals to me most about the PAE-Kx31 is the amount of actual thermal engineering backing up the design decisions along with test results. This combined with the no-sharp-edge design made the purchase of this make and model a no brainer… if I really need a heatsink.
Does my KX3 really need a better heatsink?
Again I venture to say the folks at Elecraft know what they are doing about thermal management. That said, I have been designing electronics long enough to have “blown a few” components due to heat. One Altera EPLD actually cracked open and spit out flame. Needless to say, I didn’t read the fine print about thermal management on page 18 of the Altera datasheet. I fixed that with a revision to the design, but I have always been a bit sensitive to the topic ever since.
In another instance I satiated some JPL folks’ concerns about moving a hot regulator with heatsink from directly over VME cage fans to just 5 inches away. I conducted an experiment where I proved a fan one YARD away provided well over half the cooling capability. The slightest breeze pays big dividends, but fins make this much more effective.
So… I have faith my KX3 is just fine, but… “cooler is cooler.”
While I commend Elecraft for designing their KX3 RF circuit to use transistors with “grounded” tabs, halleluiah, I never really got past the idea of not using heatsink compound between those two final transistors and the base heatsink. Shudder!
I knew I would eventually put some compound on those finals, but the well thought out PAE model makes good sense. For me an improved heatsink made the cut. I ordered a PAE-Kx31.
The installation instructions suggest three options for installing the PAE-Kx31 heatsink. I chose option 2. There are a few web sites out there documenting the steps, including this excellent review by WN8U, so I won’t repeat that here. A couple points include…
- Heatsink compound gets everywhere. Keep a paper towel handy and only use little pieces of it to mop up smears and then throw it away. If you don’t you’ll forget and wipe the stuff over something else.
- Option 2 requires some dis-assembly of the KX3 bottom portion. When I re-assembled everything with the new heatsink in place, I noticed the two-pin antenna connector below the board… sigh. I had to remove the heatsink and other things to get it out. When I did, the heatsink screw at the antenna end jammed. I had to fix the threads with my 4-40 die.
Elecraft KX3 Heatsink modification – Worth it?
It is for me. I know enough about electronic design and reliability analysis that cooler components last longer. Even if I never run digital, the tests at Pro Audio Engineering reveal the superior heat flow keeping those finals as cool as possible with a passive heat management system.
In case anyone wonders… yes this still slides into my orange satchel by Rose’s covers with great ease. The round, snag-free, lines of the PAE-Kx31 pay big dividends here.
I believe the aftermarket PAE-Kx31 KX3 heatsink by Howard (WA4PSC) of Pro Audio Engineering achieves the proper balance of performance, size, shape and mass for those seeking high duty cycle digital modes or high reliability for all modes from their Elecraft KX3.
For the “every gram is sacred” minimal mass folks, the careful engineering of the PAE-KX31 offers, in my assessment, the best performance per gram of the models I examined. I don’t have hard data on this assessment, however.
Howard accomplishes this with a round-edge, snag free design that won’t tear or rip your preferred KX3 carrier.
The heatsinks from the other manufacturers likely provide similar benefits so let your conscious be your guide. Some of the larger and seemingly more massive models do seem to achieve “slightly better” thermal performance as suggested in this independent test; The top three are close in performance and likely within the unreported margin of error. Assuming the results of the top three are basically identical, one can assess performance vs. other variables. Some have examined performance vs. cost. I’m more interested in performance vs. mass. The PAE-Kx31 keeps pace with its heavier and larger counterparts while maintaining sleek proportions, rounded edges and unobtrusive appearance; The engineering optimizations are obvious.
I know the value of thermal modeling in my line of work and the PAE-KX31 hit the right buttons for me. Any of the top three in the independent test will greatly improve the thermal characteristics of your KX3. Viva la choice!
- Elecraft Mail Reflector – KX3 and Digital Modes
- Lance Collister, W7GJ – KX3 Heat Sinks for WSJT and other Digital Modes
- Pro Audio Engineering – PAE-Kx31 Heatsink
- Aftermarket Upgrade Heatsink Alternatives for the Elecraft KX3 Transceiver, Adrian Ryan, 5B4AIY.